THE sparring between litigation funder Bookarelli and its former agent Katanga Developments appears to be drawing to a climax as the two countdown to October 7, when an application by Katanga to wind up Bookarelli is due to be heard in the NSW Supreme Court. But will it get there?
On September 17 NSW District Court Judge James Curtis set aside the judgment upon which Katanga is relying for its $172,000.00 claim against Bookarelli.
Katanga lodged the wind up application after a statutory demand requiring Bookarelli to pay the debt expired unsatisfied in August.
Lawyers for Bookarelli however insist their client is solvent, and said the judge's decision to set aside the judgement derailed Katanga's claim.
In a letter they said the winding up application had "lost its substratum or underlying cause in that the judgement upon which it was founded was set aside. They said their client was also opposing being wound up on other grounds.
"A strike out application is in the process of being made by us ....," and "Katanga will be responsible for the costs of this application as well as the costs of a Security for Costs Application to be made shortly also," they said, pointing out that in setting aside the judgement, Judge Curtis also ordered costs in Bookarelli's favour.
On September 17 NSW District Court Judge James Curtis set aside the judgment upon which Katanga is relying for its $172,000.00 claim against Bookarelli.
Katanga lodged the wind up application after a statutory demand requiring Bookarelli to pay the debt expired unsatisfied in August.
Lawyers for Bookarelli however insist their client is solvent, and said the judge's decision to set aside the judgement derailed Katanga's claim.
In a letter they said the winding up application had "lost its substratum or underlying cause in that the judgement upon which it was founded was set aside. They said their client was also opposing being wound up on other grounds.
"A strike out application is in the process of being made by us ....," and "Katanga will be responsible for the costs of this application as well as the costs of a Security for Costs Application to be made shortly also," they said, pointing out that in setting aside the judgement, Judge Curtis also ordered costs in Bookarelli's favour.